Indoor training platform choices have gotten complicated with all the apps and pricing changes flying around. As someone who’s used both Rouvy and Zwift extensively over the past few winters, I learned everything there is to know about which platform works better for different riders. Today, I’ll share an honest 2026 comparison.
The indoor training landscape has evolved dramatically since the pandemic-era boom. Zwift dominates market share, but Rouvy’s augmented reality approach and recent feature additions have positioned it as a legitimate alternative — especially for riders frustrated by Zwift’s new $17.99/month pricing.
Platform Overview: 2026 Edition

| Feature | Zwift | Rouvy |
| Monthly Price | $17.99 (increased Jan 2026) | $14.99 |
| Annual Price | $179/year | $144/year |
| Visual Style | CGI game world | Real-world video (AR) |
| Total Routes | ~120 routes across 11 worlds | 2,500+ real-world routes |
| Community Size | 4+ million users | ~500,000 users |
The Core Difference: CGI vs. Augmented Reality
Probably should have led with this section, honestly. Zwift creates a video game world — fictional landscapes with gamified elements. Rouvy shows you real-world video footage synced to your effort. These are fundamentally different experiences that appeal to different riders.
Zwift’s Approach
The CGI world keeps training engaging through gamification. You collect achievements, unlock gear, race against avatars. Some people find this motivating. Others find it distracting from actual training.
Rouvy’s Approach
That’s what makes Rouvy endearing to us who train with purpose — you ride actual roads. Preview race courses, tour famous climbs, train on routes that look like real outdoor riding. The video quality has improved dramatically in recent years.
Racing and Community
Zwift wins on community size. More riders means more group rides, more races, more people online at any hour. If you want packed races any time of day, Zwift delivers.
Rouvy’s community is smaller but growing. The racing scene is less developed, but the riders there tend to be more focused on training quality than gamification elements.
My Recommendation
For serious racers who want structured training: Rouvy offers better route preview and more realistic effort simulation.
For casual riders who need motivation: Zwift’s gamification keeps indoor training from feeling like pure suffering.
For budget-conscious riders: Rouvy saves $35/year at current pricing. That adds up.
The best platform is whichever one gets you on the trainer consistently. Both work. Try free trials of each before committing.
Subscribe for Updates
Get the latest articles delivered to your inbox.
We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.